Login
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
daf323  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, November 14, 2007 5:32:28 AM(UTC)
daf323

Rank: Advanced Member

Posts: 126

Hi,

Over in the URBN forum a discussion of how to improve upon the Stock Comparison Guide form from NAIC/BI began to take shape.  I've moved the discussion here and hope to hear folks thoughts on how to best design a web-based stock comparison for fundamental analysis.  I'll post the comments so far from the URBN forum here.  Thanks and looking forward to your feedback.

Dave

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

sc_host  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, November 14, 2007 5:38:29 AM(UTC)
sc_host

Rank: Advanced Member

Posts: 71

From the URBN forum:




armin fields







11/08/2007 8:33 PM
 


 [...]

By the way, I think the Stock Comparison Guide is a poor form with way too many questions on PEs that skew the outcome of the comparison unless you "click" them off (which you didn't);  I always "click off" lines 11, 12, 14, and 15.  Moreover, I can't learn and compare to my SSGs your Forecast Hi and Lo PEs and your Forecast Hi and Lo Prices.  And, you chose Yield for line 23 which means I can't learn your Total Return and left lines 27 and 28 blank (which aren't vital, but I like to learn R squared and compare PEGs).

Because of the SCG's shortcomings, I create a table to compare SSGs: see, for example, my posts on COH, SBUX, and IAS on INFY.

Armin









sc_host  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, November 14, 2007 5:40:16 AM(UTC)
sc_host

Rank: Advanced Member

Posts: 71

From the URBN forum:




Karen OBoyle
Denver, Colorado







11/12/2007 3:13 PM
 


Dave:  I hope you will consider some improvements to the SCG.  You are no doubt aware of the shortcomings, but I would suggest taking a look at Saul Seinbergs's analysis and critique of the tool.  You can read Saul's workshop over on Compuserve Form, Thread 28878.  In addition to Saul's comments I would add that Line 16, Current P/E ratio  might be modified.  SCG currently 'votes' for the lowest P/E ratio - maybe 'differential between current & historical P/E' would be more meaningful.  The SCG is quite a useful tool, when used with weightings and the knowledge of how the tool votes.

Bottom line, here's a 'vote' for SCG with changes and caveats and instructions.

Thanks for considering this.

Karen OBoyle









Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.049 seconds.